SESHENDRA SARMAs copyrights belongto his son Satyaki only: Indira Dhanrajgir submitted a fake document
Ad
TAGS
Download or edit the free picture SESHENDRA SARMAs copyrights belongto his son Satyaki only: Indira Dhanrajgir submitted a fake document for GIMP online editor. It is an image that is valid for other graphic or photo editors in OffiDocs such as Inkscape online and OpenOffice Draw online or LibreOffice online by OffiDocs.
SESHENDRA SARMA's copyrightsbelongto his son Satyaki only:
Indira Dhanrajgir submitted a fake document
---------------
Hyderabad
(Aadab Hyderabad): In 1989 eminent poet Guturu Seshendra Sarma gave
away the copyrights of all his works to his son Satyaki as a birthday
gift. Immediately on his demise in 2007, those rights fell into a
vortex. Indira Dhanrajgir created a false document that Seshendra Sarma
was her husband and that he had delegated the copyrights to her . She
submitted this fake document to the court. She got Seshendra's epic 'naa
desam, naa prajalu' published by Neelkamal Publications by paying
money. Satyaki filed a petition in the city civil court of Hyderabad
that this is a violation of the rights given to him by his father. After
10 years the Court gave its judgment in 2018. Justice Dr N.V. Vidya
Natha Reddy gave a clear cut judgment. In his judgement he declared that
all the copyrights of Seshendra belong to his son Satyaki . The
sensational issue in this judgement is the sending of Indira
Dhanrajgir's statement -that Seshendra was her husband and that he gave
away the copyrights of his works to her - for a forensic analysis
by the Court. The Telangana Forensic Laboratory submitted its report
that the document is fake and Seshandra did not sign the document but
his signature taken from elsewhere was pasted therein. Justice Vidya
Natha Reddy accepted the analysis of the forensic department and
delivered his judgement based on it. Sathyaki filed a caveat in the High
Court on May 2 to prevent Indira Dhanrajgir or her followers filing
an appeal in the court.
(Aadab Hyderabad : Telugu News Paper : 16th may 2018 )
-------------
LITERATURE IS PEOPLE'S WEALTH
NOT THAT PERSONAL PROPERTY OF ANY ONE
----------
In
modern literature Seshendra is a blockbuster; he was a vortex in
the field of poetry. Even after his demise, he continued to be the
centre of a sensational buzz. The controversy over his copyrights raised
such a thrilling sensation. The Hyderabad City Civil Court recently
gave its judgment. While declaring that Seshendra's copyrights belong to
his son, Saatyaki, it exposed his opponent, Indira Dhanrajgir's
criminal conspiracy. Here is an interview held with Saatyaki against
this background.
Q: How did this controversy begin?
A: I
didn't imagine that my father's gift would create so much crisis and
agony for me. I only thought that it would enable me to bring all his
works within the reach of the public at some stage. But I did realize
one thing when he was on his deathbed; this would enable me to prevent
one individual, especially the one who caused maximum harm to him, from
misusing his works for false publicity. Anyone could notice these two
angles during the 11 years' time after my father's death.
Q. How come Indira Dhanrajgir became your opponent?
A:
This role as well as her behaviour is her own choice; this is the
basic contradiction of our relationship. My aim is to reprint my
father's works for the benefit of all; her anxiety is to get his works
published by herself with the sole intention of getting publicity
mileage as his wife.
Q: Why do you talk of publicity?
A:
Right from the beginning, there had been a special page of
'dedication' in every book; this contained the wording 'wife, Rajakumari
Indira Devi Dhanrajgir (Where as in Makhdoom Hohiuddin\u2019s books her name
appears as Kumari Indira Dhanrajgir)'. There was also a foreword
written by someone in her name. Isn't this for publicity? Even now her
crying is not for his writings but for not having a special page with
her name. Those women who filled the pages of history sacrificed their
lives happily for the sake of their husband\u2019s honour and reputation. But
they never sought publicity for themselves. For the sake of claiming
her share in her father's property, this lady is sacrificing my father's
life and his literary works. Soon after my father's demise, an article
'Who are the heirs of Seshendra?" revealing all these aspects appeared.
When Vijayababu was Editor, this was published in 'Andhra Prabha' Telugu
News Paper .
Q. Which crime perspective was revealed by the Court's judgement?
A.
By giving a donation of six lakhs to Telugu University, she tried to
get my father's books reprinted by it. She submitted a document to the
University showing that my father gave her copyrights. When I sent them a
legal notice, Telugu University returned her the money as well as the
document. For the last 11 years under her pressure I thought that my
father really gave her copyrights. The Court, however, sent the document
to Telangana Forensic Laboratory. The Forensic Department submitted a
detailed report saying that the document is fake and my father's
signature was taken from elsewhere and pasted therein. The Judge in his
judgment mentioned all these aspects in detail.
Q. A few interviews given by Indiraji in Telugu have appeared recently. Have you seen them?
A.
Of course, I've seen them. She doesn't know Telugu alphabets. So ,
undoubtedly they're cooked by Her Majesty\u2019s Court Canines . That is the
origin of these interviews. The 93-year old lady who doesn't know
Telugu alphabets has directly given rebirth to an Editor of Telugu News
Daily paper as her Domestic Canine. That's her razakar skill. There's a
limit to putting a sack of lies on the head of a reader.
Introducing
herself in a poets' meet.. that too in the august presence of PV
Narasimharao in 1960 in Hyderabad ! Fantastic fiction! My father worked
as Municipal Commissioner during 1960 - 65 in Gudur, Chittoor, Ongole
and Kadapa; he was transferred to Hyderabad in 1966. Prior to '66 my
father he did not come to Hyderabad either officially or unofficially.
What was Her Majesty\u2019s life during this period? She was having a love
affair with the revolutionary poet Makhdhoom Mohiuddin. He wrote several
ghazals on love and dedicated one each to her every day. I secured
its manuscript and published its scanned Copy under the tile 'Chupa
Makhdoom'. She made his son Nusrat Mohiuddin to file a police report
against me. She reminisced her love affair with Mukhdoom in Aivan E
Urdu Idaaraa's Sab Ras, a literary monthly under the title 'Yaadein'.
You can see the video in Youtube made in February '18 by Hindi Poet
Manish Gupta when she was 93. In this 30 minutes video she fervently
recalled her romantic relationship with Late. Makhdoom .
Q. What is your real objection to her interviews?
A. No, I don't have any objection. When a Court passes its judgement and
reveals
a crime element over the copyrights of an eminent poet after 10 years,
instead of doing his primary job of highlighting the judgement for the
sake of serving the field of publications and the society at large ,
the Editor chose to hush up the matter; he published her interview mixed
with a colour of love poetry, love marriage; this shows\u2019
honourable\u2019 editor\u2019s his lack of basic sense of duty and culture
Q. What's this engagement with Patiala Prince?
A.
This is a cock and bull story. She was married to Srikishan Seth, the
nephew of Maharaj Kishan Prashad, Nizam's Prime Minister in 1945. On the
very day of her marriage, she ran away from home after thrashing him.
Since then she has been after married men under the garb of love
poetry and literature. PV Narasimha Rao and Jalagam Vengal Rao were
not prominent politicians during 1960-66. PV became Minister for
Education around '67; during '73-77 Jalagam was Chief Minister; both of
them were constantly busy in serving Indira Gandhi. Thus they had no
role to play in our Indira's street play. Since she would not receive
her share in her father's property as unmarried woman, she staged the
wedding drama which didn't have blessings from any one. Her father as
well as her younger brothers always moved with guns to shoot her and her
'husband\u2019. This situation obtains to this day. This sad state of
affairs subjected my father to an untold misery, both physically and
mentally. Finally in 2007, she stopped giving him medical treatment and
caused his death.
Q. What is your final statement?
A.
From times immemorial, literature, sciences and all intellectual wealth
have been the property of the society. This is an historical truth.
Literature is people's property; it belongs to the entire society; it
belongs to people only and it\u2019s not the personal property of one
individual.
- Shubhashree Sahithi
( Aadab Hyderabad : Telugu News Paper:18th June 2018 )
www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UfnFXnqpKQ
NOT THAT PERSONAL PROPERTY OF ANY ONE
----------
In
modern literature Seshendra is a blockbuster; he was a vortex in
the field of poetry. Even after his demise, he continued to be the
centre of a sensational buzz. The controversy over his copyrights raised
such a thrilling sensation. The Hyderabad City Civil Court recently
gave its judgment. While declaring that Seshendra's copyrights belong to
his son, Saatyaki, it exposed his opponent, Indira Dhanrajgir's
criminal conspiracy. Here is an interview held with Saatyaki against
this background.
Q: How did this controversy begin?
A: I
didn't imagine that my father's gift would create so much crisis and
agony for me. I only thought that it would enable me to bring all his
works within the reach of the public at some stage. But I did realize
one thing when he was on his deathbed; this would enable me to prevent
one individual, especially the one who caused maximum harm to him, from
misusing his works for false publicity. Anyone could notice these two
angles during the 11 years' time after my father's death.
Q. How come Indira Dhanrajgir became your opponent?
A:
This role as well as her behaviour is her own choice; this is the
basic contradiction of our relationship. My aim is to reprint my
father's works for the benefit of all; her anxiety is to get his works
published by herself with the sole intention of getting publicity
mileage as his wife.
Q: Why do you talk of publicity?
A:
Right from the beginning, there had been a special page of
'dedication' in every book; this contained the wording 'wife, Rajakumari
Indira Devi Dhanrajgir (Where as in Makhdoom Hohiuddin\u2019s books her name
appears as Kumari Indira Dhanrajgir)'. There was also a foreword
written by someone in her name. Isn't this for publicity? Even now her
crying is not for his writings but for not having a special page with
her name. Those women who filled the pages of history sacrificed their
lives happily for the sake of their husband\u2019s honour and reputation. But
they never sought publicity for themselves. For the sake of claiming
her share in her father's property, this lady is sacrificing my father's
life and his literary works. Soon after my father's demise, an article
'Who are the heirs of Seshendra?" revealing all these aspects appeared.
When Vijayababu was Editor, this was published in 'Andhra Prabha' Telugu
News Paper .
Q. Which crime perspective was revealed by the Court's judgement?
A.
By giving a donation of six lakhs to Telugu University, she tried to
get my father's books reprinted by it. She submitted a document to the
University showing that my father gave her copyrights. When I sent them a
legal notice, Telugu University returned her the money as well as the
document. For the last 11 years under her pressure I thought that my
father really gave her copyrights. The Court, however, sent the document
to Telangana Forensic Laboratory. The Forensic Department submitted a
detailed report saying that the document is fake and my father's
signature was taken from elsewhere and pasted therein. The Judge in his
judgment mentioned all these aspects in detail.
Q. A few interviews given by Indiraji in Telugu have appeared recently. Have you seen them?
A.
Of course, I've seen them. She doesn't know Telugu alphabets. So ,
undoubtedly they're cooked by Her Majesty\u2019s Court Canines . That is the
origin of these interviews. The 93-year old lady who doesn't know
Telugu alphabets has directly given rebirth to an Editor of Telugu News
Daily paper as her Domestic Canine. That's her razakar skill. There's a
limit to putting a sack of lies on the head of a reader.
Introducing
herself in a poets' meet.. that too in the august presence of PV
Narasimharao in 1960 in Hyderabad ! Fantastic fiction! My father worked
as Municipal Commissioner during 1960 - 65 in Gudur, Chittoor, Ongole
and Kadapa; he was transferred to Hyderabad in 1966. Prior to '66 my
father he did not come to Hyderabad either officially or unofficially.
What was Her Majesty\u2019s life during this period? She was having a love
affair with the revolutionary poet Makhdhoom Mohiuddin. He wrote several
ghazals on love and dedicated one each to her every day. I secured
its manuscript and published its scanned Copy under the tile 'Chupa
Makhdoom'. She made his son Nusrat Mohiuddin to file a police report
against me. She reminisced her love affair with Mukhdoom in Aivan E
Urdu Idaaraa's Sab Ras, a literary monthly under the title 'Yaadein'.
You can see the video in Youtube made in February '18 by Hindi Poet
Manish Gupta when she was 93. In this 30 minutes video she fervently
recalled her romantic relationship with Late. Makhdoom .
Q. What is your real objection to her interviews?
A. No, I don't have any objection. When a Court passes its judgement and
reveals
a crime element over the copyrights of an eminent poet after 10 years,
instead of doing his primary job of highlighting the judgement for the
sake of serving the field of publications and the society at large ,
the Editor chose to hush up the matter; he published her interview mixed
with a colour of love poetry, love marriage; this shows\u2019
honourable\u2019 editor\u2019s his lack of basic sense of duty and culture
Q. What's this engagement with Patiala Prince?
A.
This is a cock and bull story. She was married to Srikishan Seth, the
nephew of Maharaj Kishan Prashad, Nizam's Prime Minister in 1945. On the
very day of her marriage, she ran away from home after thrashing him.
Since then she has been after married men under the garb of love
poetry and literature. PV Narasimha Rao and Jalagam Vengal Rao were
not prominent politicians during 1960-66. PV became Minister for
Education around '67; during '73-77 Jalagam was Chief Minister; both of
them were constantly busy in serving Indira Gandhi. Thus they had no
role to play in our Indira's street play. Since she would not receive
her share in her father's property as unmarried woman, she staged the
wedding drama which didn't have blessings from any one. Her father as
well as her younger brothers always moved with guns to shoot her and her
'husband\u2019. This situation obtains to this day. This sad state of
affairs subjected my father to an untold misery, both physically and
mentally. Finally in 2007, she stopped giving him medical treatment and
caused his death.
Q. What is your final statement?
A.
From times immemorial, literature, sciences and all intellectual wealth
have been the property of the society. This is an historical truth.
Literature is people's property; it belongs to the entire society; it
belongs to people only and it\u2019s not the personal property of one
individual.
- Shubhashree Sahithi
( Aadab Hyderabad : Telugu News Paper:18th June 2018 )
www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UfnFXnqpKQ
Free picture SESHENDRA SARMAs copyrights belongto his son Satyaki only: Indira Dhanrajgir submitted a fake document integrated with the OffiDocs web apps
