National Security Advisory Zbigniew Brzezinski Deceptive M

TAGS

Download or edit the free picture National Security Advisory Zbigniew Brzezinski Deceptive Marxist May 12 1977 for GIMP online editor. It is an image that is valid for other graphic or photo editors in OffiDocs such as Inkscape online and OpenOffice Draw online or LibreOffice online by OffiDocs.

Zbigniew Brzezinski - National Security Advisor
March 12, 1977 Article in Utah Independent exposing some, but not all, of deceptive Zbigniew Brzezinski / backround / Marxist ideology /pro Soviet Anti America policies.

The Utah Independent
Salt Lake City, Utah
12 May 1977, Thu \u2022 Page 6

As expected, President Jimmy Carter selected Zbigniew Brzezinski as his national security adviser, thus insuring that the Kissinger detente policy will continue. For three years prior to the election of President Carter, Brzezinski had been giving foreign affairs advice to candidate Carter and more than anyone else was influential in forming the foreign policies being adopted by the Carter Administration. The outlook for the future of the United States with Zbigniew Brzezinski (pronounced Zbig-NYEFF Bre-ZHINSKI) running the show can only be pronounced B-A-D.

Interviewed at the time of his appointment, Brzezinski confirmed that as White House adviser he is responsible to insure that the Pentagon, Treasury Department, State Department, Central Intelligence Agency and others coordinate their policies and that the President's decisions are carried out smoothly. Zbigniew Brzezinski was born in Warsaw, Poland on March 28, 1928, the son of Tadeus Brzezinski and the former Leona Roman. The other children of the family include an older half brother, George, born of the father\u2019s previous marriage[clipper note: actually George Zylinski was born of mother, Leona Roman, previous marriage], and a younger brother, Lech. During most of his early childhood, Brzezinski lived with his parents in France and Germany and in 1938 at the age of 10 he accompanied them to Canada where his father served with the Polish foreign service. In 1945 he entered McGill University in Montreal where he obtained his B.A. degree, majoring in economics and political science, and an M.A. degree in 1950. He then entered Harvard University where he was granted a Ph.D. degree in 1953.

From 1953 to 1960 Brzezinski was on the Harvard faculty, advancing from instructor to assistant professor in 1956 when he was named research associate of the Russian Research Center and of the Center for International Affairs, which reportedly received financial assistance from the C.I.A. During the 1950s he often visited Eastern Europe in connection with studies of Com-

Communism. In 1960 Brzezinski was appointed associate professor of public law and government at Columbia University and in 1961 was named director of Columbia\u2019s newly formed Institute on Communist Affairs; in 1962 he was made a full professor.

Early in 1961 he served as one of President-elect John F. Kennedys pre-inaugural advisers on foreign policy. He was becoming known as an expert on Communism and wrote articles for such liberal and leftist magazines as the reporter, the New Republic and the New Leader.

When Columbia University\u2019s School of International Affairs inaugurated a series of televised lectures on contemporary world problems over five commercial stations of the Metropolitan Broadcasting Company in March 1962, Brzezinski gave the first lecture in which he alleged that there was fragmentation in the international Communist movement.

In May 1966 Brzezinski was named by President Johnson to be a member of the State Departments Policy Planning Council and he is credited with having influenced President Johnson in promoting peaceful engagement with the Soviet bloc. The term peaceful engagement was borrowed from Brzezinski\u2019s book Alternative to Partition; for a Broader Conception of Americas Role in Europe, which was prepared for the Atlantic studies policy program of the Council on Foreign Relations, a world-government-promoting organization of which Brzezinski has long been a member.

When not employed in government service, he continued his affiliation with university work. In addition to his duties as consultant to the U.S. Department of State, Brzezinski has served as consultant to the Rand Corporation (think tank).

Brzezinski is a trustee of Freedom House, a member of the advisory council of Amnesty International and longtime member of the N.A.A.C.P. In 1956 he received a grant from the leftist Social Science Research Council and in 1960 received a Guggenheim Fellowship.

Brzezinski is married to the former Emilie Benes, grandniece of Eduard Benes who had been President of Czechoslovakia. **Clip note: Marxist Benes family

An analysis of Brzezinski\u2019s philosophy and activities by a number of journalists indicates that we have another Kissinger on our hands, if not worse. On December 18, 1976 Human Events reported that Brzezinski may even try to outdo Kissinger in making peace with Communism, stating Brzezinski appears to favor diluted U.S. sovereignty, supports Eurocommunism (that is, he thinks it would be just dandy if Communist parties took part in the governments of such Western European countries as France and Italy) and he wants to make the Soviets feel secure in Central Europe.

Alex O. Starzewski (noted anti-Communist writer) wrote in an article which appeared in the Manchester Union Leader on October 6, 1976 that Brzezinski is a strong supporter of detente with the Soviet Union and that he believes Poland should stay on the side of the Soviet Union and should not turn against the Soviet Russian Imperium. Starzewski noted that should East Central Europe remain Communist and Western Europe become progressively Communist (Marxist), it will then only be a matter of political cosmetics when the first Socialistic Regime takes over the government in the United States.

Mr. Starzewski stated that a short conversation between Dr. Brzezinski and one of his friends recently shows drastically Brzezinski\u2019s political orientation. \u201cBrzezinski told my friend that he hopes \u2018the Poles are not going to get foolish again and turn against Soviet Russia because Poland\u2019s place is on the side of Soviet Russia.\u2019 Dr. Brzezinski asked my friend also why he is not going to see Poland now. \u2018You would be surprised if you would see Poland now and you would no doubt like it.\u2019

On October 13, 1976, the Washington Post reported that Jimmy Carters top foreign policy adviser said the United States should negotiate a strategic arms limitation agreement with the Soviet Union, reducing the number of bombers, missiles and nuclear warheads for both sides. Brzezinski told the Women\u2019s National Democratic Club that summit meetings should be separated from the negotiating process. The United States and the Soviet Union, he pointed out, tentatively agreed at Vladivostok in November 1974 that both countries be limited to 2,400 long-range missiles and bombers. Within that number, both countries are limited to 1,320 that can carry multi-nuclear warheads. Brzezinski said these numbers should be reduced if not in a Salt II agreement by next October when the Salt I agreement expires, then in the following Salt II negotiations.

As an expert on Soviet affairs, Brzezinski is well aware of the secret violations of the agreements previously made by the Soviet Union. In a profile article entitled, \u201cZbigniew Brzezinski: The Power and the Glory,\u201d Karen DeWitt of the Washington Post on February 4, 1977 stated \u201cIf one thinks of power as currency, then Brzezinski is a rich man. He has access to President Carter, seeing him daily at a regularly scheduled 8:30 a.m. meeting and frequently two or three times more during the day. With an office only a few feet down the hall from the Presidents, Brzezinski serves as foreign policy aide-on-call to Carter. . . when Soviet Ambassador Anatoliy Dobrynin came to call at the Oval Office, Brzezinski sat in as a conferee.\u201d

Asked about the people who have influenced him intellectually, Brzezinski mentioned the late Harvard professor Merle Fainsod, Harvard political philosopher Carl Friedrich; and the late Jesuit Pierre Teilhard de Chardin.

Brzezinski, a Roman Catholic, said: I think we do not understand fully what we are, why we are here. This is the ultimate mystery of the human experience, and therefore, some search by man for meaning beyond himself is a necessary condition of life. I\u2019m religious in a searching way. 1 would like to know why we are here. I would like to relate to something transcendental which can be called God and to religion as a search for God.

The same profile of Brzezinski points out that he became interested in Russian matters at a very early age. He started learning Russian at the family farm from a neighboring Russian farmer because he thought it might be useful in the future.

People magazine points out in its March 14, 1977 issue that Brzezinski sometimes delivered his Harvard lectures on Marxism in working men\u2019s clothing. He would come in unshaven and start attacking the students as capitalistic lackeys. He was [allegedly] an anti-Communist, but at those times he was a totally convincing advocate for the other side, said Paul Sigmund, a politics professor at Princeton.

In a three-hour interview with Time magazine, correspondent Christopher Ogden was able to get some of Brzezinski\u2019s views concerning the policies which had been pursued by Henry Kissinger (and which had led to the Communist victories in South Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Angola and Mozambique). Brzezinski stated: \u201cI don\u2019t think he has been overly soft on the Soviets.\u201d Concerning U.S -Soviet relations, Brzezinski stated \u201cWe should develop closer East-West relations. . . I don\u2019t think we can use the limited leverage we have to obtain profoundly significant systemic change in the Soviet Union.\u201d

Concerning U.S. -Communist China relations, Brzezinski stated: \u201cWe could do more to upgrade the U.S. - Chinese relationship to minimize the possibility of a swing in China toward greater normalization with the Soviet Union.\u201d Concerning Communism in Western Europe, Brzezinski stated: \u201cBut to the extent that Eurocommunism is moving toward de-Stalinization and then to de-Leninization, it is something we should welcome.\u201d

Brzezinski has written a number of articles for Foreign Policy, the international affairs quarterly. During 1976 he wrote (in an article concerning the United States and Africa): \u201cNothing could be more destructive than for the United States to position itself as the ultimate shield of the remnants of white supremacy in Africa at a time when racial equality is coming to be accepted as an imperative norm. This would rally all of Africa and much of Afro-Asia against us.\u201d

President Carter has described Brzezinski as \u201cthe key adviser for me in global affairs\u201d and stated that he had been \u201can eager student\u201d of Brzezinski for two to three years before he was elected in what amounted to a private tutorial course. While Kissinger was a protege of Nelson A. Rockefeller, Brzezinski is a protege of David Rockefeller, chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank and the Council on Foreign Relations. In 1973 Brzezinski and David Rockefeller formed what became known as the Trilateral Commission (which recruited Jimmy Carter, then Governor of Georgia, among its membership), an organization promoting world government through regional process.

There were at least 17 \u201cTrilateralites\u201d advising Carter during the transition period including Leonard Woodcock of the United Auto Workers; Henry Owen, former head of the State Departments Policy Planning Staff; and Robert Roosa, partner in Brown Brothers Harriman and chairman of the board of Brookings Institution. At least thirteen Trilateralites have already become officials in the Carter Administration (see Herald of Freedom, Vol. XXXI, No. 6). Most of these people are also members of the Council on Foreign Relations.

The Trilateral Commission published a report by Samuel P. Huntington which says that we have too much democracy and in particular too much press freedom. This report, which claims we are afflicted by a disease called \u201cdemocratic distemper\u201d and calls for increased centralized power, has proved an embarrassment to the Trilateral Commission. Brzezinski had selected his former co-author Samuel Huntington to write the report and once agreed with it but now tends to disown it. Jimmy Carter went out of his way to express disagreement, realizing that it was a potential bombshell for a man who was going around saying he was running for president.

Brzezinski, like Kissinger, has contributed advice to earlier presidential candidates including, in Brzezinski\u2019s case,Democratic Senators John F. Kennedy, Hubert Humphrey, and George McGovern.

The Los Angeles Times (January 24, 1977) noted in an article entitled \u201cBrzezinski - Activist Seeker of World Order,\u201d that Brzezinski shared the political attitudes of his college peers which were pro-Stevenson and anti-McCarthy (known as Cold War liberalism). While Brzezinski is a church goer, the articles reveals, and his children are raised as Catholics, he is quick to point out that his version of Polish Catholicism is not very demanding. \u201cYou have to realize that Polish Catholicism is fundamentally different from, let\u2019s say Irish Catholicism. It\u2019s not dogmatic; it\u2019s very liberal. My father was always very liberal - politically, socially, racially. . .\u201d

Writing in The Review of the News (Dec. 1, 1976) Bill Dunham predicted that, if selected as National Security Adviser by President Carter, Professor Brzezinski would make Henry Kissinger\u2019s betrayals of American interests look like child\u2019s play. He noted that in spite of Communist advances around the world and massive Soviet buildup in Europe Brzezinski still had the audacity to assert, in Foreign Affairs of July 1973, that finding a way to preserve the West from Communist aggression may no longer represent the central problem for the United States.

As for the captive nations that Jimmy Carter told us he was so concerned about, Brzezinski is prepared to simply write them off, and political analyst Francis X. Gannon observed that Brzezinski has long since proved himself a master of accommodation and appeasement with the Communists. Brzezinski is a staunch advocate of world government and has been a member or supporter of organizations which had this concept as their main goal.

An essay by Brzezinski appeared in the March 6, 1972 issue of Newsweek in which he stated: \u201cA community of developed nations, spanning the Atlantic and the Pacific, could eventually also embrace the more cooperative Communist states but in the meantime it would by itself represent a constructive step forward in the process of promoting global cooperation.\u201d

While Brzezinski supposedly supported the Democratic and Republican Administrations in the war in Vietnam, an organization known as the National Committee for a Political Settlement in Vietnam, Suite 516, 156 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y., in a propaganda release entitled, \u201cCease-Fire Now! By all Sides in Vietnam,\u201d listed Zbigniew Brzezinski as one of its sponsors. Among the long list of sponsors were individuals who have a history of affiliation with Communist-front organizations as shown in congressional hearings and reports. Together with the Socialists and radical pacifists, Brzezinski was advocating a policy which resulted in turning over South Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia to the Communists.

Professor Henry Paolucci in his publication State of the Nation, referred to Brzezinski as Carters Kissinger. He noted that in Brzezinskis book \u201cBetween Two Ages: Americas Role in the Technetronic Era\u201d (1969) and sharply refined in subsequently monographs, Foreign Affairs articles and Trilateral Commission reports, Brzezinski avowedly Marxist humanist philosophy of history echoes that of Walt Rostow and Henry Kissinger.

According to Brzezinski, the Western peoples, since their identifiable beginnings in the feudal era, have advanced through three great stages and are now entering a fourth and culminating stage. The first step was religious, linking a heavenly \u201cuniversalism provided by the acceptance of the idea that man\u2019s destiny is essentially in God\u2019s hands\u201d with a \u201cterrestrial narrowness derived from massive ignorance, illiteracy, and a vision confined to the immediate environment.\u201d The second stage, according to Brzezinski, was that of nationalism which, within clearly defined territorial limits, matched Christian equality before God with national equality before the law, and \u201cthus marked another giant step in the progressive redefinition of man\u2019s nature and place in our world.\u201d In the wake of Western Nationalism has come Marxism which, says Brzezinski, \u201crepresents a further vital and creative stage in the maturing of man\u2019s universal vision.\u201d But progress by no means stops there. Beyond religion, nationalism and Marxism, we now have, he tells us, his emerging technetronic age ideal of rational humanism on a global scale. Rational humanism, as Brzezinski represents it, is to be the result of the American-Soviet evolutionary transformation.

It will be recalled that Helmut Sonnenfeldt, Henry Kissinger\u2019s right-hand man who was the subject of a serious espionage investigation, conceded that East Europe is an organic part of the U.S.S.R. However, 13 years earlier, Brzezinski, writing in the New Republic (Aug. 31, 1963), conceded to the Soviet Union a stake in central Europe. He claims that the United States must design a policy for reuniting Europeans and that such a policy need not be provocative and should not ignore the Soviet stake in Central Europe. Its purpose should not be the splitting of individual East European states from the U.S.S.R. but rather encouraging the entire Soviet bloc into a closer relationship with the rest of Europe. This is precisely the policy promoted by Helmut Sonnenfeldt at a meeting in Europe; the statement was supposedly confidential but became public and caused considerable comment in Congress. Sonnenfeldt had, of course, cleared the policy with Henry Kissinger before making the statement. Therefore, Kissinger and Sonnenfeldt were simply putting forth the policy recommended by Brzezinski back in 1963.

Brzezinski has very close personal ties with David Rockefeller as Henry Kissinger had and has with Nelson. Brzezinski, who has been carrying out David\u2019s world-government program through the Trilateral Commission, has a country home near David Rockefeller in Maine. They have both been active in promoting the objectives of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. Within one or the other of these two-world government-promoting organizations, one finds the key personnel in the Carter Administration. As Nelson influenced the Nixon and Ford Administration so David Rockefeller will be influencing the policies of the present government through Carter, Brzezinski, Vance, Blumenthal and other top officials.

Free picture National Security Advisory Zbigniew Brzezinski Deceptive Marxist May 12 1977 integrated with the OffiDocs web apps